ASSESSMENT
IN A CONSTRUCTIVIST, TECHNOLOGY – SUPPORTED LEARNING
`The question we raise are: “Is it really bad to memorize for the test?” and “
Is it not good to study for score and for a grade? The answer to both
questions is a NO. it is not bad to memorize for the test. Examines even take
in Memory Plus food supplement to increase their power to memorize. Neither is
it bad to study for scores and grade, however, we should go beyond memorizing
for tests and we should not study only for a passing score and a passing grade.
In a constructivist classroom, learning transcend memorization of facts. It is
putting these isolated facts together, from concepts and making meaning out of
them. It is connecting the integration of these facts and concepts to daily
life. It is seeing the relevance of these facts and concepts to what we value
and treasure in life. If that is what learning is from the eyes of the
constructivists, then definitely, the pure memorization (sometimes without
understanding done for a mere recall test does not jibe with such belief.
What then is the assessment practice that will be congruent with the
constructivist’s thinking? It is a higher level form of assessment that will
require the display of the basic skills of writing and speaking, computing and
the more complex skills of applying concepts learned, analyzing, critiquing and
evaluating, integrating and creating and the social skills of working with call
for alternative forms of assessments. The traditional paper – and – pencil test
will prove to be inadequate to measure basic skills and social skills.
Authentic assessment is most appropriate for the constructivist classroom. (
You will learn more about authentic assessment in your two subjects on
assessment.) authentic assessments measures collective abilities, written and
oral expression skills, analytical skills, manipulative skills, (like computer
skills) integration, creativity, and ability to work collaboratively.
In authentic assessment, students perform real – world tasks, thus the word
“authentic”. It is an assessment of a process or a product. That is why
authentic assessment includes performance or product assessment. The
performance is a reliable measure of skills learned and the product is a proof
of the acquisition of skills. These performance and product are assessed. Again
the mere paper – and – pencil test cannot evaluate these. So what do we need?
We need to observe and evaluate and, to do it more objectively, with the aid of
the scoring rubric. ( You will be taught how to make a scoring in rubric in
your assessment courses.) for now it may be sufficient to see a sample of a
scoring rubric to get an idea of what it is about and to see its place in
assessment.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento